OPP lay charges in Toronto-area tobacco bust Oct 3, 2017 - Northumberland News Click one of the buttons below or search. Here you can find useful examples and description about searching the news archive. Read it carefully to get the best results. If you need more help, please contact us. Searching is case insensitive. Words music and mUSIC return the same results. Some of the common words like the, is, etc. are not included in your search. The symbol "|" stands for OR and symbol "&" stands for AND.
Vaping advocates argue that e-cigarettes are not combustible, so second-hand smoke does not pose a health threat. Barber told the Times Union the ban was focused on protecting children from second-hand smoke as well as the temptation to smoke themselves. And he disagrees that e-cigarettes are harmless to the non-users who are in the vicinity of vaping. "Children watch and observe, and vaping might look like something they would want to do someday," Barber says. "And the aerosol from electronic cigarettes can contain nicotine and other carcinogens that can be inhaled by people sharing the park. E-cigarettes are just not consistent with a family-friendly park." The new law imposes a $50 fine for the first violation, while repeat offenders could find themselves paying $200-$500. "We don't need the revenue from the fines," Barber said, adding that he was confident locals would comply with the ban. The nonprofit group Capital District Tobacco Free Communities praised the ban. "Soon, all park visitors, both human and canine, will be able to breathe easier as they enjoy walking, playing, swimming, cross-country skiing, picnicking and all the other activities the town parks support," the group said in a statement.
Some Useful Ideas On Crucial Criteria For Best Vape Starter Kit
Alt Smoke Ecigs
best Dry Herb And Wax Vaporizer Best Vape Starter Kit digital Box Mod Vaporizer
Over at Twitter, one of the focal points as Congress and others focus on Russia’s alleged use of social media to influence the election is the prevalence of bots on the platform , which can be commandeered to disseminate disingenuous information. If you thought the days of Big Tobacco ads on mainstream media were over, think again. At least temporarily. From November, the makers of brands including Marlboro and Camel have been forced by a court to buy prime-time TV spots and newspaper ads to settle a lawsuit brought nearly two decades ago by the U.S. Department of Justice over misleading statements the industry had made about the health effects of cigarettes, The Wall Street Journal reports. The ads won’t display graphic images but instead will present stark black-and-white text statements stating how tobacco companies “intentionally designed cigarettes to make them more addictive,” while another will say “more people die every year from smoking than from murder, AIDS, suicide, drugs, car crashes, and alcohol, combined.” Amazingly, there’s no requirement these ads run on any digital channels, where many young, impressionable people who might be considering taking up smoking tend to consume a lot of their media. “I think [tobacco companies are] getting off kind of lightly,” said John Boiler, co-founder of 72andSunny, an agency that does work for the antitobacco nonprofit Truth Campaign. CMO Today’s Alexandra Bruell reports: Anheuser-Busch InBev has consolidated its global media account with four agencies, down from eight. Dentsu Aegis Network wins the large U.S.